Tennessee Representative Antonio Parkinson (D-Memphis) has filed a bill in the state assembly that follows the path taken by New York and California. The bill, HB 1546, is also known as the “Create a Respectful and Open Workplace for Natural Hair (CROWN) Act of 2020.” It proposes measures to prevent racial discrimination for protective hairstyles.
New York and California
The state of New York was actually the second state, following in the train of California, to forbid discrimination based on a person’s hairstyle. Governor Andrew Cuomo signed a bill on July 12, 2019 that made changes to the state’s civil rights law, clarifying that “traits historically associated with race,” including protective hairstyles and hair texture are included in its prohibition against racial discrimination. The law includes locks, braids, and twists in these protective hairstyles.
About a week and a half earlier on July 3, 2019, California enacted a similar law as the one just implemented in New York. The California law, referred to as the “Crown Act,” makes changes to the state’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, adding to the definition of race “traits historically associated with race, including, but not limited to, hair texture and protective hairstyles.” The California law, as New York’s, defines protective hairstyles as including those such as braids, twists, and locks.
The purpose behind these laws is to address the problem of restrictive grooming and dress codes that prohibit these hairstyles and as a result have a particular discriminatory impact on employees and applicants who are of African American descent.
The Tennessee bill
The proposed bill in Tennessee would prohibit discrimination against any person for his or her protective hairstyle or race. Again, the protective hairstyles in the Tennessee bill include, but are not limited to locks, twists, and braids.
In the bill, race is defined as ethnic background, ethnic group identification, ancestry, and cultural or physical characteristics connected with a particular race, including, but not restricted to protective hairstyles and hair texture.
If the bill passes and is signed into law, it would go into effect on July 1, 2020.
Concerns have existed for quite some time that hair could be a factor involved in racial discrimination against individuals. However, in late 2018, the issue gained attention across the nation when a New Jersey high school student, who was also a wrestler and wore dreadlocks, was told to cut his hair. The reason given by the referee of the match was that his hair was not compliant with league rules. As a result, the state of New Jersey, under the office of the Attorney General’s and its Civil Rights Division conducted an investigation about the incident and the potential for unfairness or bias in high school sports.
The proposed law in Tennessee along with the new laws in California and New York may serve as reminders to employers in those states to check their grooming and dress code policies to ensure none of them have a disparate impact on the protected category of race.
If you have suffered unlawful employment discrimination under federal law, Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts, or of other human rights laws in the state of Tennessee, or any other state, we may be able to help you. Call us today at 888.996.9731 to get in touch with Justin Gilbert or Jonathan Bobbitt at The Gilbert Firm, or complete our contact form to arrange a free consultation at one of our offices in Nashville, Memphis, Chattanooga, Jackson, or Knoxville.
Insurance companies have traditionally sought to minimize the amount they pay for any mold or black mold claims. Some insurers will try to pay a sparse amount or nothing at all for anything associated with mold cleanup, even when a water event that causes water damage is covered, but also leads to indoor mold contamination. A denial of a legitimate claim involving mold damage can certainly constitute an unfair or
Residential and commercial real estate sales occur on a daily basis. Usually, the title transfer of the sale occurs without much fanfare regardless of whether the transaction involves a residential home or business real estate. The same is true when it comes to transferring insurance from the seller to the buyer. Up to the closing point, the seller generally insures the property. When closing occurs, the buyer generally insures the property.
Insurance policy exclusions can dramatically affect insureds who think that they are protected completely when dealing with fire, storm, wind, hail, theft or other issues with their property. An insurance battle stemming from Hurricane Harvey in Texas was recently settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. The plaintiff, a woman who owns multiple
The claims adjuster is an important cog in the insurance machine. This person is responsible for coverage determination, investigation /evaluation of the claim and damage, and ultimately determining how much of a financial obligation the insurance carrier has and will pay on your claim. Understanding what it is a
It is a common practice for individual states to pattern their own laws governing sexual harassment and other discrimination issues on existing federal laws. The sexual harassment laws in Tennessee give victims of sexual harassment protections based the state Courts’ interpretation of
Insurance disputes can arise out of even the most minor of issues between policyholders and insurance carriers. These disputes can involve just about anything under the sun, including bad faith claims. So, what does an insurance dispute attorney do for a policyholder in a bad faith claim?
When you purchase an insurance policy, you’re ensuing that, in the event of a loss, there is a way for you to put your property back in pre-loss condition. Did you know that most states have a “Bill of Rights” for property owners which sets forth some basic rights to which a policyholder is entitled under their policy? For example, Tennessee has one that applies to homeowners’ claims of $20,000 or more. In Tennessee, all policyholders must be given a written statement of those rights from their insurer.
Even in 2018, it’s still a challenge for women to get equal pay for performing the same work as men. It’s often difficult to uncover these disparities due to employer confidentiality, but when employees become aware of wage inequalities, they must have the means to address it. Fortunately, they do, under the Equal Pay Act.
The protection you purchase with your insurance policy is supposed to be there when you need to access it for yourself or your loved ones. However, too often insurance companies fail to live up to their promises when accidents, storms, tragedy or disaster hits. A claim denial or delay can keep you from accessing the benefits you are owed under the terms of your policy. You might even experience a retroactive cancellation of your policy after you file a claim. Or, your insurer may fail to resolve your claim the way the policy dictates. These situations and others are at the core of insurance disputes and often involve bad faith on the part of the insurance company.