Categories
Bad Faith Insurance Disputes

Was Hotel Damage from Hurricane? Insurer Says No

Was Hotel Damage from Hurricane? Insurer Says No MS Amlin insurance company sued the policyholders of a Florida hotel, stating that Hurricane Irma did not cause the more than $1 million in damages claimed. Instead, they argued that the majority of the building’s issues already existed before the September 2017 storm, and were mostly the result of shoddy construction work.

The lawsuit

The insurance company, MS Amlin Corporate Member Ltd., sued policyholders SoHo Realty LLC and Yahav Enterprises LLC in federal court in Florida on October 18, claiming the following: that MS Amblin does not have to cover the damage, that its appraisal is correct, and that the property owners’ appraisal is not impartial.

In a letter to the insureds, MS Amlin’s attorney wrote, “Underwriters’ investigation has concluded that the vast majority of the observed damage at the property showed no signs of being caused by Hurricane Irma and in fact predated the storm.”

The property is part of the Alexander Hotel in Miami Beach and includes a two-story ballroom, restaurant space, kitchen, gym, office, and outdoor tiki bar. It’s also in the midst of a $40 million restoration project, according to MS Amlin.

Hurricane Irma hit the Miami area around September 10, 2017, and the insureds filed an insurance claim a little over a week later. Their adjuster, Hernan C. Dominguez Jr., first estimated the damage at approximately $978,000 but later revised that amount to slightly over $1.1 million.

The appraisals

Dominguez reported that all of the damage to the property was a result of wind and rain from Irma. MS Amlin’s appraiser, however, reported that only about $58,000 of damages were a result of the hurricane. Further, according to the policy, coverage is limited to $2.8 million for improvements, $1 million for business income and $300,000 for the tiki bar. Each of those numbers comes with a five percent deductible for windstorms.

Using MS Amlin’s number of $58,000, the repair costs don’t exceed the deductibles, so the insurer claims they’re not required to pay out anything to the defendants. The insurer’s appraiser reports that the other damage appears to have been caused by leaks in walls, ceilings, pipes and air conditioning units, as well as mold and mildew, which is not covered by the current policy.

SoHo and Yahav are challenging MS Amlin’s appraisal, but the insurance company wants an impartial appraiser. The property owners’ choice, Dominguez, was hired on the contingency that his fee be linked to the amount of money recovered. “It is clear that Mr. Dominguez’s personal financial interests would be tied to the insureds’ in any appraisal,” MS Amlin claimed.

This is set to be an interesting case and gives some good insight to the world of appraisals and commercial claims. It also reminds us why it is so important to understand your policy contract before you sign it, so that you do not lose out if you ever need to make a claim.

The Gilbert Firm is highly experienced and respected in insurance disputes. Our Tennessee attorneys work to protect you when your insurer fails to pay out a claim or continually delays your payment. Brandon McWherter, Clint Scott, and Jonathan Bobbitt provide skilled, professional representation. Call us today at 888.996.9731, or fill out our contact form. We maintain offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville.

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Types of Insurance Property Management Companies Need

Types of Insurance Property Management Companies NeedClaims and lawsuits against property managers are a common occurrence. As the owner of a property management company, failing to have the proper insurance protection in place can leave you and your business exposed to unnecessary financial risk. As well, your clients are relying on you to carry the proper insurance to protect their assets. Acquiring the appropriate insurance coverage to protect your business, yourself, and the properties you manage is essential when establishing yourself as a property manager.

Below is a quick rundown of the types of insurance coverage you need as the owner of a property management company.

General liability insurance

If you make frequent visits to clients, or if clients visit you, it is important to have general liability insurance. This type of insurance covers claims against you and your business from another party who alleges you are at fault for their personal injury or property damage. It is designed to cover medical bills, repairs and replacements, compensation, and legal costs.

This insurance can also save your reputation if you are sued by a renter for some other reason that has the potential to mar your reputation, and thus threaten your livelihood. This coverage can get you the legal representation you need and pay any damages plus legal fees involved in the case.

Business personal property insurance

Adding business personal property insurance to your policy package protects any movable item in your office space, including filing cabinets, desks, chairs, etc. It also covers mobile devices when you are outside of the office visiting owners and renters or viewing properties.

Professional liability insurance

As a property manager it is important to have professional liability insurance to provide you with protection against any omissions or errors you make in the performance of your services and in your business relationships with landlords and renters. If your client loses money due to a mistake on your part, you can be sued – in fact, you may face a lawsuit even if you have not made an error. This insurance coverage is also often referred to as errors and omissions, or E&O coverage. It can also cover you for work you have performed for others in the past in the event that someone decides to sue you for an old error or alleged error on your part.

Property insurance

When working as a property manager, it is also necessary to determine whether you or the property owner is responsible for insuring the property. Even if it is the property owner, it is important to make sure that the proper insurance coverage is obtained in the proper amounts. This will save a lot of heartache after a claim.

Workers’ compensation insurance

Workers’ compensation insurance is required for certain employers in TN. It is generally required under the law for companies having five or more employees regardless of fault. In some industries in the state, employers with only one employee are required to carry this insurance, unless they are specifically exempted. Workers’ comp can save your business from financial ruin in the event of a workplace injury to one of your employees. The insurance covers a portion of the workers lost wages, as well as medical expenses.

Cyber liability insurance for property managers

Cyber liability insurance is also referred to as cyber risk insurance and data breach insurance. As a property manager, you likely store significant amounts of confidential electronic information, including personal data on tenants and owners. You may have a website and use email. If this is the case, you and your business are potential targets for cybercrime.

Property managers can receive the following coverage through cyber liability insurance:

  • Investigative costs involving a cyberattack and informing your customers
  • Lost income if the attack prevents you from conducting business
  • The repair and restoration of your website and data
  • Legal damages and fees if you face a lawsuit for losing private data of another party

Your business will have to cover these costs if you do not have coverage and you are hit with a cyberattack.

Getting sufficient property management insurance coverage

Generally it is optimal to have insurance coverage for your business, your renters, and your clients, as well as the properties you manage. However, the requirements among property management business owners vary.

It is often better to err on the side of overestimating the coverage you need. The compensation, attorneys’ fees, and court costs can skyrocket in the event of a lawsuit. Purchasing as much coverage as you can realistically afford will help ensure you, your assets, and your reputation are protected when disaster strikes.

If you are having problems with an insurance claim you submitted, or are facing an insurance dispute, our attorneys at the Gilbert Firm in Tennessee can help. We can fight for your right to obtain the fair financial compensation you are owed for your losses. We serve our clients from offices in Nashville, Memphis, Knoxville, Chattanooga, and Jackson. To schedule a free, no-obligation consultation about your case, give Brandon McWherterClint Scott or Jonathan Bobbitt a call today at 888.996.9731, or complete our contact form.

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Issues Involving the Use of Drones in Reconstruction Activity

Issues Involving the Use of Drones in Reconstruction ActivityResidential and commercial builders are now using drones to perform aerial views of properties, enabling them to use the recorded images and data for more efficient and accurate construction activities. Drone videography and photography services are also used by real estate agents and property developers to market listings and prospect for land development opportunities, respectively.

Developers and construction companies who use drones for commercial purposes are required to follow the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) operational requirements for business use, referred to as Part 107. The FAA regulates both the business and personal use of drones. The goal of the agency is to protect the national airspace and also human life and property in the air and on the ground.

As part of these rules, users must obtain a required remote pilot airman certificate. The FAA requires all owners of drones that weigh between 0.55 and 55 pounds to register their unmanned aircraft online before sending it up into the airspace.

Drone use for home reconstruction

The tasks drones are now used for on a consistent basis include property surveying and estimating the quantity of excavated material at a site. These drones utilize mapping software that is able to calculate the volume of material at a location and whether enough is available on site for adequate site leveling, or whether additional material must be hauled in to the site to adhere to the construction plans.

As Jeffrey J. Nix, partner at Taylor English Duma LLP states, “It’s a lot cheaper and quicker than going out and trying to figure out elevations throughout the entire site.”

Why policyholders should care about drones

The FAA is obviously concerned about the threat posed by drones – both commercial and personal – to commercial and private aircraft. At the same time, the insurance industry is concerned about how drone use affects home insurance. As more drones fill the airspace, claims against drone owners will also increase due to accidents that cause property damage and personal injury. The question for homeowners is whether or not their current homeowners’ insurance policy covers damage involving accidents caused by drones.

A standard homeowners’ policy provides coverage for property damage and bodily injury. However, such coverage may be narrowed due to policy exclusions. The ownership, use, or maintenance of aircraft may be an exclusion on certain policies. Therefore, one may not necessarily assume coverage for drone use, until the policy language is examined.

Perhaps more pressing, however, is whether drones will lead to increased denials of claims based on the footage they capture. Insurance coverage only extends to damage caused by an event: a tree falling on your roof, damage from hail, house fires, etc. Policyholders have a difficult enough time getting fair compensation for their claims; would that change if drone footage is allowed to be used to justify a denial? Construction companies aren’t using military-grade hardware and software, which means the footage can be grainy and unfocused. This will present just another obstacle in the way of policyholders getting the compensation they need.

If you are having trouble obtaining the insurance payout you deserve in the wake of residential property damage caused by a negligent party, we are here to help. Our Tennessee property claims attorneys at the Gilbert Firm serve clients from our offices in Nashville, Memphis, Jackson, Chattanooga, and Knoxville. To arrange a free consultation, call attorney Jonathan BobbittClint Scott or Brandon McWherter today at 888.996.9731 or send us a message through our contact form.

 

 

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Denied Rightful Benefits? Check These Water-Based Insurance “Loopholes”

Denied Rightful Benefits? Check These Water-Based Insurance “Loopholes”Being a homeowner isn’t always easy. There’s so much that goes into owning a home, including having an insurance policy that protects you from various dangers. But, does your insurance policy actually protect you? Many insurance policies have different riders that wind up costing the homeowners more than just their premium when damage is done to their property. For example, has your home been damaged by a flood, a storm, or a broken pipe? Are you under the belief that your policy will cover such damage? Depending on your policy, you may not be covered after all.

Burst pipes vs. slow leaks

Let’s begin with a claim dispute from Chesterfield, Virginia. The policyholder walked into her home one day and waded through water. The contractor identified three leaks in the home, one labeled as short-term (or new) and two labeled as long-term (or gradual).

Despite the homeowner’s policy covering water damage, the insurance company only issued a check for part of the claim. The company claimed that the damage to the home was considered gradual, because of the two long-term leaks – and that gradual wear and tear was not covered under the policy.

Is my water damage covered?

It’s important to know what your policy covers before you get into trouble. There are some claims that may be covered in full, such as roof leaks, burst pipes, water lines from appliances and compressor breaks.

You could also suffer water damage from a severe storm, such as a hurricane, which leads to one of the most common problem homeowners face: they have coverage for hurricanes through their policy, but the insurance company won’t pay in full because the policyholder isn’t covered for flood damage. You should look into flood coverage, as it may save you in the long run.

Pay close attention to the language of your policy

The terminology, or wording, used in the policy can be deceptive, too. Often, these policies are written in draconian “legalese,” and most policyholders don’t read their policies in their entirety, creating another way for the insurance company to deny a claim. Talk to your agent about your policy, and make sure to have the coverage you need.

Were you denied benefits by your insurance carrier because of one of the “loopholes” mentioned here? If so, it’s time to speak with an experienced Tennessee insurance dispute attorney from The Gilbert Firm about your situation. Brandon McWherter, Clint Scott and Jonathan Bobbitt provide residents of Tennessee with honest and trustworthy representation. Call the office at 888-996-9731 or fill out the contact us form found on the website to schedule an appointment.

 

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

How Misrepresentation Can Void Your Insurance Policy – A Must-Read

How Misrepresentation Can Void Your Insurance Policy – A Must-ReadA court decision in Tennessee regarding a homeowners’ insurance policy recently caught our eye. We thought it was a great opportunity to talk about the concept of misrepresentation and fraud.

In the case of Conley v Tennessee Farmers, Dolores Conley brought suit against her homeowners insurance company, requesting they pay her claim for damages after a house fire. Tennessee Farmers countered that because of Conley’s misrepresentation regarding a prior foreclosure, her policy was void. Tennessee Farmers alleged that misrepresentation concerning this foreclosure materially increased the risk of loss for the insurance company.

Conley explained that she was not involved in the foreclosure and her name was not on the loan for the property that went into foreclosure. However, the Court still held that misrepresentation voided the policy, because it increased the risk of loss, and whether or not she did it intentionally was irrelevant.

Understanding misrepresentation

This case is an interesting lesson in misrepresentation in insurance policy applications. In the insurance industry, misrepresentation is a false statement on an application for insurance coverage that, if told truthfully, would affect the company’s decision on issuing the policy.

Although misrepresentation doesn’t necessarily void a policy, Tennessee law (T.C.A. § 56-7-103 ) reads as follows:

  • 56-7-103. Misrepresentation or warranty will not void policy Exceptions. No written or oral misrepresentation or warranty made in the negotiations of a contract or policy of insurance, or in the application for contract or policy of insurance, by the insured or in the insured’s behalf, shall be deemed material or defeat or void the policy or prevent its attaching, unless the misrepresentation or warranty is made with actual intent to deceive, or unless the matter represented increases the risk of loss.

The “unless” is the important part here. In the case above, the Court pointed out that the misrepresentation increased the risk of loss, rendering the policy void.

Whether a misrepresentation is innocent or fraudulent, it can result in a denial of benefits. It’s crucial you understand the terms of your policy and complete your application truthfully.

However, it’s not uncommon for claims to be wrongfully denied for misrepresentation. Maybe the questions on the application were confusing or vague. Perhaps your agent didn’t ask you all of the questions. An experienced Tennessee insurance dispute attorney can work with you to find out why.

If you have any questions or concerns about your policy or need legal assistance, the Tennessee insurance dispute attorneys at The Gilbert Firm can help. Talk to Brandon McWherter, Clint Scott, or Jonathan Bobbitt for smart and honest representation. Call us today at 888.996.9731, or fill out our contact form. We maintain offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville.

 

 

Categories
Bad Faith Insurance Disputes

Class Action Suit Against Travelers Alleges Deceptive Insurance Practice on Rot Coverage

Class Action Suit Against Travelers Alleges Deceptive Insurance Practice on Rot CoverageA class-action lawsuit filed recently in Philadelphia state court claims that Travelers is selling rot insurance to homeowners while concealing the actual terms of the proposed coverage. According to the lawsuit, Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Co. allegedly markets and sells add-on homeowners’ insurance to consumers that is supposed to provide coverage for rot and fungus damage. However, the insurance policy fails to explain that certain causes of rot damage are not included in the coverage.

Rose vs. Travelers

Sean and Jamie Rose – plaintiffs in the lawsuit – purchased a homeowners’ insurance policy from Travelers that included supplemental coverage for rot damage, fungus, and microbes, which added to the cost of the policy.

The add-on coverage apparently included “limited ‘fungi,’ other microbes or rot remediation coverage,” in addition to rot removal and replacement of damaged property. The conditions making the coverage effective included the rot occurring as a result of a covered cause and the damage promptly reported by the homeowners.

In August 2018, when a water pipe broke in their master bathroom and kitchen, the Roses expected to have the damage covered by their homeowners’ insurance. However, the insurance company reportedly sent a representative who claimed that the damaged pipe had been leaking for a prolonged period of time – weeks, months, or years – disqualifying the damage for coverage under the policy.

The specific letter sent by Travelers to the family in October 2018 included the following statement: “Rot is indicative of an ongoing presence of moisture for weeks, months and years. Since water damages that occur for a period of weeks, months or years are excluded, your policy does not provide coverage.”

Travelers would not pay rot coverage

Travelers allegedly sent company representative Janene Harlieb to the Rose’s home to obtain a statement from the homeowners in the aftermath of the water damage. As Ms. Harlieb investigated the damage, she allegedly told the couple that she did not see how Travelers would provide compensation for the damage despite the insurance add-on purchased by the couple.

In the lawsuit, the Roses claim that “Ms. Harlieb indicated that she was not aware of why there was rot coverage as there was no situation for which Travelers would pay for rot.” In the lawsuit, the Roses claim bad faith insurance practices, breach of contract, and violation of Pennsylvania’s consumer protection laws by Travelers, stating: “Defendant, despite demand for benefits under the policy, has refused without legal justification or cause, and continues to refuse to pay to plaintiff monies owed for the damages.”

In the class-action suit, the Roses’ claim that Travelers manipulated its customers into buying additional rot coverage without ever intending to pay out claims under the coverage:

“The practice of Travelers in interpreting the portion of the policy, advertised as ‘additional coverages,’ despite the intention to never provide this additional coverage which is otherwise provided in this policy and was provided in previous policies, has been perpetrated by Travelers maliciously and in conscious disregard for the rights of its policyholders solely for the financial advantage of Travelers.”

The Roses, representing a Class of Pennsylvania residents who paid Travelers extra for rot coverage but were denied that coverage when issuing claims, are seeking compensatory damages, additional damages, attorney’s fees, and court costs.

At the Gilbert Firm, we offer proactive legal counsel to victims of bad faith insurance practices in Tennessee. If you have been subjected to bad faith or breach of contract by an insurance company, our experienced Tennessee bad faith and insurance dispute attorneys can help. Call Jonathan BobbittClint Scott or Brandon McWherter today today at 888.996.9731 or use our contact form to set up a free consultation about your case.

 

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Home-Based Business and Business Interruption

Home-Based Business and Business InterruptionMore and more people are working from home these days, whether it’s full-time for a brick-and-mortar company, as telecommuters, or as independent business owners. Because of the increase in work-at-home employees, it’s important to look at how insurance policies protect your home-based business property in the event of damage. 2018 was filled with horrific catastrophes including massive wildfires, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes and crippling blizzards. Would your home-based business survive if a weather event or other catastrophe caused damage to your home?

Business interruption insurance

Imagine if your home suffers a fire. The homeowners’ insurance you have on the home will cover the damage left behind by the fire, even if it’s not a total loss, but the income you miss out on due to being unable to work will typically not be covered by a normal homeowners’ policy. If you have business interruption insurance, the lost income as a result of the fire will be covered.

Business interruption insurance is an important coverage all businessowners should consider, no matter whether the business is home-based or the more traditional brick-and-mortar style. Business interruption (“BI”) coverage is routinely packaged into a broader businessowners form that covers business personal property, equipment, inventory, etc. BI coverage helps cover the income you will lose if you need to close your business for an extended period for various reasons. But when buying BI coverage, be sure to ask questions to make sure the coverage is properly tailored for your particular enterprise. For example, things like co-insurance, whether or not payroll costs are covered, the limits of the coverage, etc. can all have a dramatic increase on whether the policy will actually serve the intended goal of putting the business in the place it would have been had there been no loss at all.

There are exclusions and specific items that are not covered by business interruption insurance. For example, practically all policies limit coverage to losses of income that result from a risk that is covered by the underlying policy, i.e., wind, hail, fire, etc.  The fine print is also important, and it is critical to gain a good understanding from your agent about what is covered and what is not covered. For example, if you own a home-based business that sells product stored off-site, would your BI coverage kick-in to cover a loss of income caused by a fire to your product that was damaged by fire while in a warehouse owned by someone else? If you don’t ask and explain the nature of your business to your broker, you might be in for surprise.

Is business interruption coverage worth it?

Business interruption coverage may be a vital component to the continued the health and success of your home business in the aftermath of a catastrophe. But, it’s not for everyone. If you are a life coach and can continue your work in other locations, maybe it’s not a big deal for you.

Did you have to close your home-based business for an extended period due to some type of weather event? Did a fire or flood stop you from working?  Did your insurance carrier fail to properly pay your BI claim?   If so, it may be time to speak to an experienced Tennessee insurance dispute attorney from The Gilbert Firm about your situation. Call the office at 888-996-9731 to speak with Brandon McWherter, Clint Scott or Jonathan Bobbitt today. Complete the contact form found on our website to schedule an appointment.

 

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Tennessee Policyholders Bill of Rights

Tennessee Policyholders Bill of RightsWhen you purchase an insurance policy, you’re ensuing that, in the event of a loss, there is a way for you to put your property back in pre-loss condition. Did you know that most states have a “Bill of Rights” for property owners which sets forth some basic rights to which a policyholder is entitled under their policy? For example, Tennessee has one that applies to homeowners’ claims of $20,000 or more. In Tennessee, all policyholders must be given a written statement of those rights from their insurer.

Under the law, and “at a minimum, the written statement… shall advise policyholders of their rights to:

  1. Receive quality repair work to restore the damages to the policyholders’ property;
  2. Have the repairs made by a contractor of the policyholders’ choice, understanding that the contractor is hired by the policyholder and that this contractor does not work for or at the direction of the insurance company;
  3. Receive a copy of the insurance policy free of charge upon request;
  4. Be informed of the need to file a proof of loss, if required;
  5. Receive the name, phone number, and address of the claim representative handling the loss;
  6. Receive a detailed estimate of the scope of damage and costs of repairs. Should the contractor selected by the policyholder have questions concerning the insurance company’s estimate, the policyholder or the policyholder’s contractor should contact the policyholder’s claim representative directly;
  7. File supplemental claims as the need arises; and
  8. File a complaint with the [state’s insurance] department by calling the policyholder service section at 1-800-342-4029, if the policyholder is unable to work out an agreement after speaking with the policyholder’s claim representative, agent, and the company.”

If you were not given a written statement of your rights when you filed your claim, you should request one from your insurance company. It can help protect you in case you need to make a claim.

I think my rights were violated; do I need a lawyer?

If you sustained a loss and submitted a claim through your insurance, and that claim was unfairly denied or delayed, or if you were given a lowball settlement offer, it may be time to seek legal counsel. An experienced Tennessee insurance dispute attorney will review your claim, your policy, and the offer from your insurance company, and determine whether or not you have been the victim of bad faith. If you have, you may be entitled to money for the damages you sustained, but also additional compensation in the form of statutory penalties and punitive damages.

To learn more about your options, or to reserve a consultation with Jonathan Bobbitt, Clint Scott, Brandon McWherter, or any of our Tennessee insurance dispute attorneys, please call the Gilbert Firm at 888.996.9731, or fill out our contact form. We maintain offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville, and serve insurance clients throughout Tennessee, and in Mississippi and Kentucky.

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Condo Insurance Dispute Must Be Arbitrated, Insurer Tells Court

Condo Insurance Dispute Must Be Arbitrated, Insurer Tells CourtIn a notice filed with a Texas federal court on October 17, Lloyd’s of London underwriters and the International Insurance Co. of Hannover SE told a Texas federal court that the owner of a condominium complex must arbitrate a $1 million dispute over a denied insurance claim.

The Winfield IT Condominium Association filed a lawsuit in Texas state court in August 2018, alleging that the underwriters and a group of foreign insurers owe over one million dollars for wrongly denying their condo insurance claim following a severe storm that hit the Houston area in the spring of 2017. Winfield also stated the investigation of its property and the related storm damage was “substandard.”

However, in their removal notice filed with the court, the underwriters and insurance company argued that the dispute must be arbitrated in New York under a clause in both parties’ contract. This clause is called the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, which is an international treaty that guarantees citizens of signatory countries (in this case, the underwriters and insurance company) the right to enforce agreements to arbitrate disputes.

So, in short, this means that Lloyd’s of London and International Insurance Co. of Hannover SE are exercising their right to arbitration and believe the Convention clause warrants removal of Winfield’s lawsuit.

The insurance dispute at hand

The dispute began when Winfield filed a claim against its policy (issued by the Lloyd’s underwriters and several other insurers, including Indian Harbor Insurance Co. and QBE Specialty Insurance Co.) after storm damage in 2017. However, Winfield alleges that its claim was denied after a slipshod and improper investigation of the property and damages.

Winfield argued that the investigation failed to include all of the damage visible during the inspection and undervalued the damage it did include – resulting in a claim payment of zero dollars. Winfield sought a second opinion, which assessed the damage at more than $800,000.

Alleging the “unreasonable” investigation was why its claim was denied, Winfield also included the insurance adjuster as a defendant in the lawsuit and asserted that the defendants violated state law that bars false, misleading, or deceptive acts or practices.

If you’re involved in an insurance dispute or have questions about a claim, our attorneys can help. The legal team at The Gilbert Firm is committed to helping you receive fair and prompt payment for your claims, and has extensive experience handling complex arbitration and litigation. Clint Scott, Jonathan Bobbitt and Brandon McWherter provide honest representation for the people of Tennessee. Call us today at 888.996.9731, or fill out our contact form. We maintain offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville.

 

Categories
Insurance Disputes

Federal Judge in Illinois Sides with Insurer over Water Damage Coverage

Federal Judge in Illinois Sides with Insurer over Water Damage CoverageU.S. District Judge Sue E. Myerscough, of the Central District of Illinois, granted summary judgment to West Bend Mutual Insurance Co., ruling that the company was not responsible for the nearly $1 million in repairs to a Hampton Inn that sustained water damage. The lawsuit was filed two years ago by the hotel owners, who claimed that “the Wisconsin-based insurer didn’t specify that the policy excluded ‘continuous or repeated seepage’ and ‘leakage of water’ claims in a pair of letters denying coverage for damage,” Law360 reports.

The plaintiffs claimed that West Bend was responsible for the repairs under the “mend the hold” doctrine, which bars insurance companies from changing the existing reason, or introducing new reasons, for denials once litigation has begun. They also claimed that under the ensuing loss clause exemption in the policy, West bend should be liable for repairs, because the water damage to the hotel had happened over a course of years “due to what the court found to be shoddy construction.”

Judge Myerscough rejected both arguments, claiming that the clauses did not apply to water damage, and “because the insurance company simply said the damages weren’t covered in its denial letters and did not change its basis for denial later.”

Does your policy cover what you need it to cover?

Just because Judge Myerscough rejected the plaintiffs’ claims in this case, does not mean a viable claim for repairs cannot be made. In truth, insurance companies often try to avoid paying water damage claims on the basis that the damage started to accumulate long before the claim was made, through some unrelated issue. If your insurer feels that the damage done to your property was caused by two different events or incidents, and one of those events is not covered by your policy, the company may try to deny your claim under an anti-concurrent causation clause. However, not every exclusion contains anti-concurrent causation language.

Whether you are a commercial policyholder or a residential policyholder, it is critical that your policy reflect what you need. We urge you to review your policy with an agent to ensure you have proper coverage. If your agent cannot answer your questions, or seems to hesitate when it comes time to explain what is and what is not covered, then it might be time to come see us.

The Gilbert Firm protects the rights of policyholders in Tennessee, Mississippi, and Kentucky. When you pay your premiums, you deserve to have the insurance company uphold their end of the bargain. To review your case with an experienced Tennessee insurance dispute lawyer like Clint Scott, Brandon McWherter or Jonathan Bobbitt, please call 888.996.9731, or complete our contact form. We maintain offices in Nashville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Jackson and Knoxville, for your convenience.